The people doing all the beginning research & work from decades ago should have skipped automobiles-motorcycles & such, as they should phased-out or at worse- replaced with 1 per 10,000 of people or more with: solar panels on bodies, flying & self-driving versions of automobiles, with storage & room for many people. Gone right to our species (the normally used term is sexist) powered cycles, more or less than just two-wheels.
What you think?
I dislike the laziness & getting in the way & on non-motored pedestrians ways of motorized cycles, scooters & Etc…
With the above in consideration, do you consider:
Motorized cycles, scooters & Etc. actually cycles, scooters & Etc. or just different type of automobiles? After all they did exist extremely early on, before motorcycles,
&
Self-driving cycles, scooters & Etc. actually cycles, scooters & Etc. or not?
&
If not, then what do you consider them?


Do you have 1 (or at least 2) better sources, than one that allows anyone to edit away the truth & facts?
its just about the rowbike. I doubt people are looking to redo facts around a stupid niche gadget. the thing is not made anymore so you can google around and mostly blogs will talk about it incuding the blog of the guy who invented it (more like trademarked it). I can personally attest I was looking at it back when it was actually being sold and if I had the cash might have gotten the quad version.