• Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    6 days ago

    “The botnet was taken offline by the provider because it was used for criminal purposes.”

    Isn’t the botnet itself a criminal intrusion? I mean, it’s unlikely that the owners of the exit nodes were even aware they were part of it.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      It sounds like people installed one of those free proxy things that’s actually malware. I’m not sure I’d call that “intrusion” but it’s certainly illegal.

      • kn33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        I mean, it might’ve not been illegal. It was probably hidden in some T&C somewhere. That’s the trade-off. You get a free privacy proxy, they get a free residential proxy endpoint.

        • frongt@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Deploying botnet software is usually always illegal, regardless of consent.