I think that really nails it. Also, I think something the panel highlights, is how dismissive and frankly, arrogant, the existing criticism of Clavicular seems to be. Because it only further entrenches people who might be convinced by Clavicular to be even further influenced by Clavicular.
The Austrailian 60 minutes interview, where the interviewer with like, underwear model level good looks makes the claim “Of course my success isn’t related to me being handsome. Obviously its because I’m so egregiously talented”: Its so on the nose.
And I love how FD connected it to white supremacy, because its exactly what it is. Its the same thing, and his metaphor that white supremecy is the dark matter of our society; that its made to be invisible but makes up 90% of what exists…
I think that really nails it. Also, I think something the panel highlights, is how dismissive and frankly, arrogant, the existing criticism of Clavicular seems to be. Because it only further entrenches people who might be convinced by Clavicular to be even further influenced by Clavicular.
The Austrailian 60 minutes interview, where the interviewer with like, underwear model level good looks makes the claim “Of course my success isn’t related to me being handsome. Obviously its because I’m so egregiously talented”: Its so on the nose.
And I love how FD connected it to white supremacy, because its exactly what it is. Its the same thing, and his metaphor that white supremecy is the dark matter of our society; that its made to be invisible but makes up 90% of what exists…