• Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Good on Canada to protect their media industries instead of letting American firms drown them out.

    If you want to do businesses in a country, don’t complain when they ask you to invest a bit back.

    • ben@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is just corporate welfare for our media corporations. If you think this is going to do anything other than just end up flowing up to the executives of Bell, Rogers, and Telus media then you are mistaken.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        This isn’t meant to be the be all end all solution to every single problem eey ore.

        It’s a specific mechanism that keeps money in Canada instead of drifting away.

        It is objectively a good thing.

        • ben@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t see this ending up as anything other than the companies effected increasing their prices to cover themselves (and then some) and then the adjusted revenue being taken as a tax and passed directly to the media industry. We’re just funnelling money to executives that will lobby for more money to be funnelled to them instead of them actually making a product that people want to use

          • masterspace@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Some of that money goes into producing Canadian Content which employs Canadian artists and the broader Canadian arts industry. That’s better then that money going to Hollywood and supporting the American arts industry.

            Either way the benefits are just trickling down rather than going directly to artists, but with these laws more money stays local in Canada rather than going to the US.

            You are arguing about whether that money should trickle down or be given directly to artists and that is quite frankly, completely irrelevant given that both options here (the rates increasing or the rates not increasing), don’t effect that.