To be clear this is not a real product or whatever I would just be interested in people’s thoughts.

Do you think you would like privacy focused smart goggles? Eg: no camera/hardware camera lock, all on device intelligence, signal support, idk what else you guys can leave ideas in the comments.

      • Vegafjord oakframer@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Either we normalize smart glasses or we dont. There’s nothing in between. We should not play into Metas surveillance strategy.

      • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’d say, b/c it’s impossible to know that by looking at the glasses.

        You see a rando walking around with smart glasses. You can’t tell at a glance what it can / cannot do. So you must assume the worst.

        I’m with Vegafjord oakframer. Normalization will be problematic. Maybe in a perfect world it coudl be OK. But in our world, abuse at scale is 100% inevitable. That’s why I think social pressure against smart glasses is for the best.

    • divingdonkey@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Or at least make them “for professional use only”, and regulate them like they’re body cams. If companies risk GDPR fines, they might self-regulate enough to take care of the problem.

  • LeapSecond@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    If smart glasses become mainstream you’ll have many people wearing them in public. And you can choose privacy respecting glasses but most people will not. So maybe let’s not make them mainstream.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    There are some already, e.g. https://docs.brilliant.xyz/ with firmware you can replace or https://mentraglass.com/ and I even made one by sticking a RPi with its tiny camera on 3D printed frames https://twitter-archive.benetou.fr/utopiah/status/1449023602079240194/

    I’m not saying it’s a good idea or that it’s private enough, just that it’s not a theoretical questions, alternatives to Meta or Google Glass do exist already and some of them are not cloud dependent.

    IMHO what’s important is to be explicit about usage, understand how it’s used and have informed consent. If you use them to be sneaky and hurt others, even if they are “privacy focused”, fuck off.

  • StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    I mostly just don’t see the point in them. If the technology could run a live adblocker that would be a different story.

  • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Smart glasses with HUD and speakers, and bluetooth, no cloud dependency - yes, please.

    With camera - absolutely not. This would be just a hidden recording device, absolutely capable of intruding other’s privacy, regardless if it’s cloud connected or not. I realize that camera provides a lot of functionality, but I just don’t see the way how it can preserve privacy of other people and fit in glasses form factor.

    • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Actually, there is a way to use a camera, but I’m not sure if it’s possible from technical or usability perspectives.

      Imagine a device that has a camera, but no data connectivity. No WiFi. Only USB for charging and firmware updates. Maybe BT for firmware or control from app. No memory card slot either. Internal storage reserved for system only, camera software cannot store videos or images persistently.

      This will probably have to be not open source, especially if bluetooth is present - otherwise someone will figure out how to capture camera feed with a custom firmware.

      But if possible, such device can use camera for smart navigation, object recognition, some basic tasks on-device, depending on how much compute (and battery) can be placed into such a small package.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        The problem there is nobody else will know if yours are the privacy friendly glasses with a camera or not. They’ll just see smart glasses w/ camera. I certainly wouldn’t associate with someone wearing those fucking things, and I’m not going to bother to research which models are which.

  • defrostedLasagna4921@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    This is something I’ve been wanting, but with a camera. I take lots of videos on my phone everywhere I go, but I often miss moments and record too late. I think having glasses with a camera can make my life documenting easier.

  • Ŝan • 𐑖ƨɤ@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 days ago

    We got some camera glasses as swag and gave þem to by BIL. He used þem to take candid photos of our 4 y/o niece, who was hyper camera-conscious and knew when þe phones were being used for pictures, and would invariably pose. Þe glasses were þe only way he could get pictures wiþout interrupting whatever was going on. I believe þere’s use for þem even outside of industry. Þere are stages of dementia where having AR would be helpful to þe sufferer.

    I’d like access to privacy-conscious AR.