Mr Postman's Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
R1x38rexrper@lemmy.ml to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months ago

aliasvault/aliasvault: Privacy-first password manager with built-in email aliasing. Fully encrypted and self-hostable.

github.com

external-link
message-square
17
link
fedilink
3
external-link

aliasvault/aliasvault: Privacy-first password manager with built-in email aliasing. Fully encrypted and self-hostable.

github.com

R1x38rexrper@lemmy.ml to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months ago
message-square
17
link
fedilink
GitHub - aliasvault/aliasvault: Privacy-first password manager with built-in email aliasing. Fully encrypted and self-hostable.
github.com
external-link
Privacy-first password manager with built-in email aliasing. Fully encrypted and self-hostable. - aliasvault/aliasvault
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Per the github page “With the API stabilized, we aim to have AliasVault undergo a thorough security audit this stage. We have already initiated conversations with renowned cyber security companies who have taken interest in taking this on.”

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I hope it doesn’t say as I didn’t bother to check - how do free projects get money for audits like this?

      • DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Good question. I don’t see anything about current funding. They do mention in the road map having a premium cloud subscription to cover cloud hosting.

        I’m a keepass user myself. Too many hosted programs turn to crap one way or another. Let alone the trust componet. I hope for the best with this software.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Has this been audited? It’s easy to claim that something is secure, but there have been products that made such claims and were trivially exploitable.

    • jay@mbin.zerojay.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The Github page says they are aiming to get one done soon.

      • dreamkeeper@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They shouldn’t claim that an effing password manager is “secure” until after they’ve done an audit.

        I’ll pass, thanks.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Do you have thoughts on 1password?

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m curious why you asked this?…

      • robocall@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Aren’t both of them password managers? I guess I wonder if someone has a preference for one over the other.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          They are, it’s just odd to bring up an unrelated software.

          I do use 1Password and like it, but I couldn’t compare it to this one.

  • hellmo_luciferrari@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ll optimistically sit back and see what comes of this. I’m happy with vaultwarden.

    • saddlebag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s good to have options

      https://www.fastcompany.com/91542655/bitwarden-scrubs-always-free-and-inclusion-values-from-its-website-as-longtime-execs-step-down

      • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They said VaultWarden, not BitWarden. This shouldn’t affect them.

        • lastweakness@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It could. The removal of “transparency” indicates to me that the clients might also stop being open source at some point and Vaultwarden doesn’t have its own clients.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    One thing that jumps out at me reading the readme is the fact that it has a built in email server. Email is hard to get right, and I’m surprised a relatively young(?) project is working on getting all the moving pieces together rather than declaring it out of scope.

    It’ll be interesting to see how it develops.

    • zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would never trust a newly written email server and there is absolutely no reason not to use an already existing as a dependency to this project.

  • Kazel@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Thanks but i stick to keepass. It does the job

Selfhosted@lemmy.world

selfhosted@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !selfhosted@lemmy.world

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don’t control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don’t duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you’re providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post.

Resources:

  • selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
  • awesome-selfhosted software
  • awesome-sysadmin resources
  • Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.17K users / day
  • 2.85K users / week
  • 6.18K users / month
  • 13.9K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 60.5K subscribers
  • 1.22K Posts
  • 20.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Ruud@lemmy.world
  • Loki@lemmy.world
  • CannaVet@lemmy.world
  • devve@lemmy.world
  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
  • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
  • curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.19
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org